![medium quality korean drama video joiner medium quality korean drama video joiner](https://images.hancinema.net/images/korean_dvd_vcd_box.41472.jpg)
There are clear objective errors in the methodology of the study design, data collection or analysis The manuscript does not have a valid research question or hypothesis The Frontiers Research Integrity Team ensures that manuscripts adhere to high quality research and ethical standards and prevents the publication of any manuscripts that are below our quality standards.Īt any stage before official publication, if a manuscript does not meet our editorial criteria and standards for publication, or if peer-review or research integrity concerns are raised by any review participant or reader (abstracts are published online ahead of official publication), the Journal’s Chief Editors and Frontiers Chief Executive Editor will investigate these concerns, regardless of peer review or acceptance stage.įrontiers applies the following criteria for acceptance and rejection of manuscripts:Īll submissions accepted at Frontiers must be VALID:
#Medium quality korean drama video joiner how to#
If an editor, reviewer or author is in doubt on how to proceed during the peer-review process, the Frontiers Peer Review Team is the main point of contact for guidance, with two specialized sub-teams: the Research Integrity Team and the Editorial Review Operations Team. They only endorse publication if the reviewers validate the contents of a manuscript.Ĭhief Editors, handling Editors, reviewers and authors are guided and supported by the Frontiers Peer Review Team, a dedicated team that upholds and ensures high quality standards for manuscripts and the peer review itself, certifying the quality, scientific rigour and validity of research articles and promoting collaboration among authors, reviewers and editors. They evaluate the methodology of a study for solidity and rigor, ensure the research provides valid conclusions, and is supported by sufficient data.Įditors are subject experts and assess the peer-review process and manuscripts meticulously. Reviewers are subject experts and evaluate manuscripts by using the quality assessment tool and designated review questionnaire that prioritize scientific quality, rigor and validity. They must comply with all editorial and ethical policies and take all reviewer and editor comments into consideration. What is expected of everyone involved?Īuthors must submit a manuscript that has significant scholarly value and falls within the scope of the journal. This model ensures rigorous peer review, rapid decisions and the publication of high-quality research. Frontiers’ dedicated in-house Research Integrity Team performs pre- and post-review quality screens and can reject articles that do not meet acceptance criteria. Handling Editors and reviewers can recommend rejection at any time Editors make acceptance decisions and Chief Editors make acceptance and rejection decisions. Instead, we judge the value and validity of presented work through rigorous quality checks and empower our Editorial Boards to take charge of content decisions. Frontiers does not reject manuscripts based on their perceived potential impact, nor does it set a rejection rate – formal or informal. Manuscripts that pass these criteria are accepted, those that do not pass the criteria are rejected. All submissions, including those that are part of themed Research Topic article collections, undergo the same rigorous review process.įrontiers upholds strict quality standards for manuscripts and the peer-review process through clear criteria and dedicated teams. We continuously innovate to provide cutting-edge tools and services for an efficient peer review. To achieve this, we developed a unique, award-winning Collaborative Review Forum that unites authors, reviewers and the handling Editor online and brings the highest quality service to all participants of the review process. Last, but not least, peer review needs to be efficient. At the same time, it should be rigorous, fair, constructive, accountable and transparent for everyone involved. We believe peer review must be centered on objective criteria for the validity and quality of the work presented. Peer review is handled by active researchers and scholars, carefully appointed to our Editorial Boards according to strict criteria of excellence, and who certify the accuracy and validity of research with their names on the published article. The Frontiers Collaborative Review aims to maximize manuscript quality while ensuring the rights of authors to submit their work for a rigorous, constructive and transparent review process.